Legal Opinion

Buckner v. Buckner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 3, 2014No. S13F1561PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENHAM, Justice.

Acting pursuant to Rule 34 (4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Georgia, we granted the application of appellant Angela Buckner (Wife) for discretionary review of the trial court’s order denying her motion to set aside the consent final judgment of divorce entered in the action filed by appellee Mark Buckner (Husband) and denying her motion to rescind or reform the settlement agreement the parties signed. The record reflects that on December 20, 2012, the parties appeared for a final hearing on their divorce proceeding but continued to negotiate in an attempt to reach a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cochran v. MurrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Moss v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. DeGarmo v. DeGarmoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Primary Investments, LLC v. Wee Tender Care III, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Pope v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hart v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. Progressive Electrical Services, Inc. v. Task Force Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Steele v. SteeleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  4. Mary Messick v. John MessickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  5. Progressive Electrical Services Inc. v. Task Force Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API