Etters v. Musser
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 48, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Centre Co., In Equity, Sept. T., 1912, No. 3, dismissing a bill in equity in case of Lillie C. Etters, L. W. Musser and Katherine Musser v. G. Frederick Musser, Boyd A. Musser, Nannie Hand-long, Helen D. Duff and Lydia C. Bowman. Bill in equity for partition of real estate.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 48, Jan. T., 1913, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Centre Co., In Equity, Sept. T., 1912, No. 3, dismissing a bill in equity in case of Lillie C. Etters, L. W. Musser and Katherine Musser v. G. Frederick Musser, Boyd A. Musser, Nannie Hand-long, Helen D. Duff and Lydia C. Bowman. Bill in equity for partition of real estate. Orvis, P. J., filed the following opinion: The plaintiff’s bill asks that a commission in partition be issued to divide and partition and allot the lands and tenements as described in said bill, or in case the same cannot be divided without prejudice, to…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the Common Pleas.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Shoup v. ShoupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Marchand v. MarshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Dutrow v. Bohn, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County1958
- Chapin v. Bond, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County1924
- In re Brinton PartitionPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Lawrence County · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.