Legal Opinion

Carlin v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 2, 1917No. 1035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding. - The Court in the opinion stated the facts as follows: This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding wherein priority of invention was awarded to appellee, Hyman Eli Goldberg.

Read the full summary

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding. - The Court in the opinion stated the facts as follows: This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding wherein priority of invention was awarded to appellee, Hyman Eli Goldberg. The application of appellant, Samuel Edward Carlin, was filed December 12, 1904, and that of Goldberg was filed May 28, 1904. Goldberg, being the first to file, is the senior party. When the interference was declared Goldberg, under rule 122 of the Pules of Practice of the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Orsdel

At the outset, we are confronted with'a question of jurisdic*543tion. The order of the Commissioner appealed from is as follows: “The party Carlin has petitioned that the decision of October 28, 1915, be modified by entering an award of priority. That decision was rendered on appeal by Carlin from a decision of the Examiners in Chief affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner and the Law Examiner granting certain motions to dissolve filed by Goldberg. These motions to dissolve were based on the ground that the Carlin application, as filed, did not disclose any carrying mechanism, and that it…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  2. Ellis-Foster Company and Montclair Research Laboratories v. Union Carbide and Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  3. Radio Corp. of America v. Philco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Gyro Process Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Edward J. Brenner, United States Commissioner of Patents, Phillips Petroleum Company v. Goodrich-Gulf Chemicals, Inc., and Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API