Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Succession of Malone

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1991No. 90 CA 1034Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarter, Judge

I agree with that portion of the majority opinion reducing the principal amount in Mr. Malone, Jr.’s favor from $114,165.95 to $79,402.07; however, I respectfully submit that Mr. Malone, Jr. has already received the money for which he now claims an accounting. Therefore, his demand should be denied.

The Civil Code article relied on by the majority, LSA-C.C. art. 626, requires that a writing evidence a renunciation of a usu-fruct. The writing requirement for renunciation insures that the usufruct continues to burden the property of the naked owner until clearly and unequivocally renounced by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bulliard v. BulliardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. In re the Succession of FarrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API