Legal Opinion

Pomerantz v. New York State Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

" 'What constitutes unprofessional conduct * * * must be determined by those standards which are commonly accepted by those practicing the same profession in the same territory’ ” (Matter of Bell v Board of Regents, 295 NY 101, 110, quoting Matter of Cherry v Board of Regents, 289 NY 148, 158). It has long been recognized "that there is one course of conduct which in each and every profession is known as a matter of common knowledge to be improper and unprofessional ”, namely, fee splitting with a layperson (supra, at 111; see also, Matter of Okereke v State of New York, 129 AD2d 373, lv…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Matter of Cherry v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Garofalo v. DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Okereke v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Necula v. GlassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API