Legal Opinion

Chaker v. Chaker

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 19, 1986No. 85-389PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Defendant appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial, in which he alleged that the trial court erred in granting his counsel’s motion to withdraw. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

This divorce case was tried on a contested basis over four days throughout a six-week period in February and March of 1985. At the end of the third day of trial, March 26th, defendant’s attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for the defendant. The motion was promptly granted, and the defendant proceeded pro se the following day, the fourth day of trial. Following entry of the court’s final divorce…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Smith v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Lanphere v. BeedeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Fishman v. ConwayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Landry v. FaulknerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chaker v. ChakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Cameron v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Pouech v. PouechSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. Augustson v. Linea Aerea Nacional-Chile S.A. (LAN-Chile)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Carbonic Consultants, Inc. v. Herzfeld & Rubin, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API