Levine v. Levine

In my opinion, the majority’s position herein is not consistent with the recent case law authority and practice of this court. Since section 236 (part B, subd 5, par g; subd 6, par b) of the Domestic Relations Law mandates that the court “set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its decision”, remanding a case for additional findings pursuant to paragraph d of subdivision 5 and paragraph a of subdivision 6 may be an appropriate remedy where such findings have not been made. (D’Amato v D’Amato, 96 AD2d 849; Nielsen v Nielsen, 91 AD2d 1016; Hanford v Hanford, 91 AD2d 829.)…