Legal Opinion

United States v. Southern Power Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1929No. 2764PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). We think that the decree of the judge below denying the injunction was clearly right, and this for three, reasons, viz.: (1) Because the right of way in question had been acquired by defendant, and had been marked out and defined and devoted to a public use prior to the institution of the condemnation proceedings, and the statutes under which the government proceeded did not authorize the condemnation of sueh property; (2) because, in view of the agreement between the parties, the defendant was not a trespasser upon- the lands of the government, whatever…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Matthews v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Tacoma Safety Deposit Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Eighty Acres of Land in Williamson CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1939
  2. Carmack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  4. Swetland v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  5. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API