Shambry v. Housing Authority of City of Dallas
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Only one point of error is presented in petitioners’ application for writ of error. It is: “The Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that petitioners were not entitled to interest on the sum of $3850.00, the amount deposited in the Court by Respondent.”
We approve the holding by the Court of Civil Appeals on the question of interest as presented in the point urged hera.
But Respondent, as appellant there, presented five other points wholly unrelated to the question of interest which were decided by the Court of Civil Appeals, but which are not presented here. Hence we have no jurisdiction as…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Arete Partners, L.P. v. GunnermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- City of Houston v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Thomas v. Housing Authority of City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Uehlinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Central Power and Light Company v. GraddyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.