Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1981No. 815DC375PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Plaintiffs sole question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Our Supreme Court in Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 158, 179 S.E. 2d 396, 398 (1971) stated the rule that “[o]n a motion by a defendant for a directed verdict in a jury case, the court must consider all the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff.” (Citation omitted.)

The key in this case is whether…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Werner v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. American Trust Co. v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Martin v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. FulfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Koger Properties, Inc. v. LoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Leake v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Leake v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Troublefield v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API