Cooper v. Henderson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
Plaintiffs sole question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Our Supreme Court in Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 158, 179 S.E. 2d 396, 398 (1971) stated the rule that “[o]n a motion by a defendant for a directed verdict in a jury case, the court must consider all the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff.” (Citation omitted.)
The key in this case is whether…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Werner v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- American Trust Co. v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Martin v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. FulfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Koger Properties, Inc. v. LoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Leake v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Leake v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Troublefield v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.