Legal Opinion

Atlantic Joint Stock Land Bank of Raleigh v. Finch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

We see no prejudicial error in tbe peremptory instructions given by tbe court below. It may be noted that tbe plaintiff introduced as its witnesses tbe three parties primarily involved in this controversy, N. B. Eincb, bis wife Bettie D. Eincb, the father and mother, and N. H. (Herman) Eincb, tbe son — a young minister. N. B. Eincb and bis wife, Bettie D. Eincb, testified that they bad no intention or purpose in their minds to defraud tbe plaintiff, and tbe son testified that be bad no knowledge of any fraud on their part. “Even if they bad been attempting to defraud their creditors I would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Unaka & City National Bank of Johnson City v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bunn v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Foster Ex Rel. Foster v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Bunn v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API