Legal Opinion

Branham v. Bezanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Young, J., presiding, overruling a demurrer to the answer. *

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

Action under the statute to determine adverse claims to real estate, the complaint alleging plaintiff to be the owner and in possession. The answer first denies plaintiff's title, and, in a paragraph designated “second,” alleges that defendant is the owner in fee-simple, and, in'another paragraph designated “third,” proceeds : “And for a third and further defence, the defendant alleges that this defendant is the owner in fee-simple of the real estate de*50scribed, under a tax certificate” — then attempting to set forth a tax sale to one from whom defendant derived the title passed by the sale.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winston v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Nunnemacker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Brodie v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API