State v. Bistarkey
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
We find that R.C. 2947.061’s language that its operation is [s]ubject to sections 2951.02 to 2951.09 of the Revised Code” plainly means that *9eligibility for probation under R.C. 2951.02 is a prerequisite to eligibility for shock probation under R.C. 2947.061. We therefore affirm the appellate court.
R.C. 2947.061(B), which allows a defendant to move for shock probation after serving six months of a sentence, read, at the time pertinent herein, in relevant part:
“Subject to sections 2951.02 to 2951.09 of the Revised Code * * *, the trial court may, upon the motion of the defendant, suspend the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Corrigan v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. EatonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.