Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Spooner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1906No. Docket No. 126Published

Error to Van Burén; Carr, J. Replevin by Charles E. Patterson against Henry M.. Spooner. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s’ court by writ of replevin November 15, 1904. Affidavit and bond filed on said date and writ issued on said date, and the usual writ and declaration in replevin was filed irt said cause, claiming damages for $100, or under, for certain type, leads, metal furniture, etc., and also three packages of circular letters and an envelope card. The' defendant pleaded orally the general issue. No defense was put in in the justice’s court, and a judgment was. rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $10.24 damages and the sum of $3.80 costs, and against the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCabe v. LoonsfootMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API