Legal Opinion

In Re Durham

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah

Decided December 14, 2006No. 06-23034PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION OVERRULING AMERICREDIT’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION

WILLIAM T. THURMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter before the Court is an objection to confirmation of the Debtor’s proposed chapter 13 plan. AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (“Americredit”) objected to confirmation because the Debtor proposes to surrender its collateral in full satisfaction of AmeriCredit’s claim. AmeriCredit argues that this treatment conflicts with the intent behind 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a). 1 The Debtor argues that this treatment is allowed under a plain reading of § 1325(a) and objects to AmeriCredit’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. In Re EzellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
  5. In Re SparksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance v. Rodriguez (In Re Rodriguez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC v. Quick (In Re Quick)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re PintiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. In Re BlancoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  5. In Re VanduynUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API