Ashby v. State

Appellant was convicted of vehicle taking and of being an habitual criminal.

First, he challenges the constitutionality of the act which permits allegations of former convictions to be a part of the charge on which he must go to trial. This question has been decided by a number of decisions in this state, and we do not find cause at this time to reconsider them.

Secondly, appellant questions the manner of the selection of the jury. In view of our final conclusion, and the fact that the questioned situation is not likely to arise again, we need not give further notice to it in this opinion.

The…