Legal Opinion

Baer v. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 25, 2016No. 15-3040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Steven Baer appeals the dismissal of his suit claiming that the federal and Wisconsin prohibitions on the possession of a firearm by a felon violate both, the federal and state constitutions. Because Baer’s federal claims are foreclosed by our precedent and the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to address Baer’s state-law claim, we affirm the judgment but modify it to reflect that the dismissal of the state-law claim is without prejudice.

Baer’s lawsuit, brought against the attorneys general of the United States and Wisconsin, seeks a declaration that the federal…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Rhonda Ezell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rickey I. Kanter v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Hatfield v. SessionsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Medina v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API