Legal Opinion

Mauney v. Hamilton.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ActioN by Y. Mauney against E. B. Hamilton and others, heard by Judge Walter U. Neal and a jury, at December Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of Stanly County. Erom a judgment for the defendants the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

PLAINTIPP's appeal.

CoNNOR, J.

Tbe plaintiff alleged tbat tbe defendant E. B. Hamilton was indebted to bim in tbe sum of $180.00 and interest; tbat said indebtedness bad been reduced to' judgment wbicb was duly docketed in tbe Superior Court of Stanly County, January 6, 1896; tbat prior to said date tbe defendant E. B. Hamilton, for tbe purpose and with tbe intent to defraud bim, conveyed to bis wife, tbe defendant Mary E., a lot in tbe town of Albemarle and a tract of land in Stanly County containing 40 acres; tbat thereafter tbe defendants C. B. and N. E. Little, with notice of said…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. M. P. Hubbard & Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API