Legal Opinion
San Francisco NAACP v. San Francisco Unified School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 20, 1990No. 88-2627PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We are asked to determine whether the 1983 consent decree designed to desegregate San Francisco public schools requires the State of California to reimburse fully all desegregation expenses incurred by the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD).1
I
In 1978, the San Francisco Branch of the NAACP and individual parents on behalf of their children filed a complaint against the San Francisco Unified School District and its officers, and the State Board of Education, its individual members, the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the State Department of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Vertex Distributing, Inc. v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., Falcon Manufacturing of California, Inc., James Allen, and Michael AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Board of Education of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brinkman v. GilliganDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- San Francisco NAACP v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- San Francisco Naacp v. San Francisco Unified School District v. State Department of Education, State Superintendent of Public Instruction and State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990