Legal Opinion

Steiger v. Waite Grass Carpet Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 21, 1912No. 156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Emil H. Steiger and Thomas W. Jerrems against the Waite Grass Carpet Company. On final hearing. Decree for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

Suit on letters patent No. 745,625, applied for January 15, 1903, and No. 824,871, applied for September 21, 1905, for feeding mechanism for grass twine machines, issued to complainant Jerrems. Two claims only are in issue, being the first claim of each patent, as follows:

“1. A feeding device for a machine of the character described, comprising opposing blades or bars having co-operating serrated edges, and means for vibrating one or more of said blades or bars to produce the feeding action, substantially as deeribed.”
“1. In a feed device of the character described,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Oshkosh Grass Matting Co. v. Waite Grass Carpet Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1912
  3. Barnett v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API