Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mazzoli v. City of Des Moines

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1954No. 48445Published

1DissentSmith, J.

(dissenting) — The majority opinion holds the district court had only appellate jurisdiction, acquired by a notice of appeal instead of an original notice, and therefore the thirty-day limitation on plaintiffs’ right to a judicial determination of their damages was not tolled under rule 49, R. C. P., by delivery of the notice to the sheriff for service. I cannot concur., Rule 49, in the division on “Commencement of Actions”, provides in effect that limitation of actions, “whether the limitation inheres in the statute creating the remedy or not,” is tolled by “delivery of the original notice…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. StudeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Booth v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Standard Oil Co. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API