Legal Opinion
Estrada v. Scribner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2008No. 06-55013PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAER, Senior District Judge:
Petitioner-Appellant Julio Salazar Estrada (“Petitioner” or “Estrada”) appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition for a new trial after his conviction in California state court for second-degree murder, see Cal. Pen.Code § 187, as well as taking a vehicle without the owner’s consent, see Cal. Veh.Code § 10851(A). Estrada claims that his rights to due process and a fair and impartial jury under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated because juror misconduct resulted in the consideration of impermissible extraneous…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Stanley v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Fairbank v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rivera-Moreno v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.