Legal Opinion

Gugenheim v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1950No. 6062PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOKES, Justice.

Prior to May 2, 1947, the appellant, A. D. Gugenheim, and his son and daughter, A. D. Gugenheim, Jr., and Betty Manheim, were partners, doing business at Amarillo and Hereford under the trade-name of A. D. Gugenheim Company. On that date they entered into a contract with the appellee, Austin P. Hancock, by the terms of which the parties agreed to incorporate the business under the corporate name of A. D. Gugenheim Company, Inc. The contract provided that the capital stock of the contemplated corporation should be $150,000, divided into shares of the par value of $100 each and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. E. B. Waples & Co. v. H. C. Overaker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Tufts v. T. L. Lawrence & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bowden v. Southern Rock Island Plow Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Campbell v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Cisco N.E. R. Co. v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lee v. CherryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Marion v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. M. B. Kahn Const. Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. United States ex rel. Pan-Caribe Construction Co. v. Peco International, S.A.District Court, Canal Zone · 1965
  5. Clearview Louver Window Corp. v. Rubin Glass & Mirror Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API