Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Donald Wayne Herbst

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 11, 1977No. 76-1778PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

Donald Wayne Herbst (Herbst), appellant pro se, seeks review of his jury conviction of violating 18 U.S.C.Á. § 2314, i.e., interstate transportation of forged securities. A detailed recitation of the procedural background is required to facilitate our review.

Herbst was charged in the District of Kansas with four violations of § 2314 on September 25, 1974. Thereafter, on November 21, 1974, he was arrested in the District of Wisconsin on charges of violations of § 2314. On March 20, 1975 Herbst pled guilty in Rule 20 1 proceedings to a total of eighteen (18) counts,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. William Earl BurkhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Jack Moody Stricklin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Arthur Eugene ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. William T. BostonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Howard Lee WilksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API