Legal Opinion
Colosimo v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 20, 2000No. 2D00-3399PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
775 So.2d 352 (2000)
Kendal COLOSIMO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-3399.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
October 20, 2000.
2Per curiam
Kendal Colosimo appeals the summary denial of her "motion to credit time served in court ordered drug rehabilitation program" filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because Colosimo's motion is facially insufficient under State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998), and Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). These cases hold that credit time issues are cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Forszpaniak v. ForszpaniakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
4Cited by3 opinions
- Toomajan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Gilbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006