Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Johnson

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 24, 2001No. 3:00-cv-02709Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is petitioner Gayland Bradford’s Ex Parte Application for Au thorization of Funds for Expert Assistance, filed August 8, 2001. In it, petitioner moves the Court, under 21 U.S.C. § 848(q)(9), to authorize funding for expert/investigative assistance in this capital habeas action. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES the motion without prejudice. 1

I

Federal courts are authorized under the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to provide investigative and expert assistance to indigent petitioners in capital habeas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Clark v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Fuller v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. David Lawson v. Gary Dixon, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API