Legal Opinion

Kralik v. 239 East 79th Street Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered September 26, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and declared plaintiffs not to be “holders of unsold shares” in the cooperative, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs contend that they are holders of unsold shares by virtue of their compliance with paragraph 38 (a) of the proprietary lease. However, such a provision, alone, “does not create rights [as a holder], it merely extinguishes them” (Craig v Riverview E. Owners, 156 AD2d 157, 158 [1989]). There must also be compliance with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Craig v. Riverview East Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Pacella v. 107 West 25th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gandelman v. 150 Burns Apartment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API