Legal Opinion
Shawano County v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The appellant, under sec. 59.08, Stats., duly enacted the following ordinance :
“Section III. No person shall hold or conduct a public dance except that he shall have present at said dance a duly authorized and acting dance inspector . , . and said person so holding said dance shall pay to said inspector at the conclusion of the dance the sum of $5.
“Section IV. It shall be the duty of such inspector to be present at such dance to see that the laws of the state, the ordinance, rules and regulations are complied with and enforced and for this purpose such inspector shall have the powers of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Village of West Salem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Krueger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Vilas County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Rainbow Gardens v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kagel v. BruggerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Anderson v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Seward v. WisdomAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- County of Leon v. SaulsSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Shawano County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.