Legal Opinion

January v. Mansell's administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 9, 1817PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Owsley.

Wear* of opinion the court below held correctly, that January, for services performed as attorney for the intestate, was not entitled to a lien upon the money collected by him, ™der a suit brought by the administrator; and it being admitted that there are outstanding demands against the estate of superior dignity to simple contract debts, (of which January’s is one) more than sufficient to consume all the assets in the hands of the administrator, and the claim against January, that court also decided correc^y *n ,u)t permitting the demands of January…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. de KermelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  2. Ely v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
  3. Pipkin v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Akin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  5. M'Clain v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1825

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API