Legal Opinion

Ley v. Blose

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1998No. 29A02-9708-CV-553PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellants, Larry J. Ley, M.D., and Urological Care, P.C., present an interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s order directing third party health care providers to release records relating to Ley’s treatment for alcohol abuse.

We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for determination of whether I.C. 16-39-2-7 (Burns Code Ed. Repl.1997) protects against the disclosure of certain medical records.

Upon appeal, Ley and Urological Care argue that the trial court’s order violates federal and state statutes, and regulations promulgated thereunder, protecting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Green v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Barnes v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kmart Corp. v. EnglebrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Vargas v. ShepherdIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Mullins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API