Legal Opinion
Terry v. Supreme Forest
District Court, D. Tennessee
Decided December 22, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, District Judge.
In this cause the defendant Supreme Forest, Woodmen Circle, answered the bill of the plaintiff and set up and claimed the right to interplead by virtue of the Act of Congress passed May 8, 1926 (28 USCA § 41, par. 26), authorizing certain insurance companies to file bills of interpleader. The sum of $716.26 was paid into court by the defendant Supreme Forest, Woodmen Circle. Counsel for Terry and for the Woodmen Circle have agreed upon an order allowing the accrued costs to be paid out of the fund and forwarded this order to the court for approval. Messrs. Tatum & Tatum,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Groves v. SentellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Seth Spring & Sons v. South Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Louisiana State Lottery Co. v. ClarkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1883
- Hughes v. Union Insurance Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BondurantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Danville Building Ass'n v. GatesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1946
- Western Life Insurance v. NanneyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
- First Nat. Bank v. BakerDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1936