Legal Opinion

Guy Patrick Johnson and Victoria Lynn Johnson, individually and as Successors-in-Interest of Guy Adam Johnson v. County of Stanislaus, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 22, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00865Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GUY PATRICK JOHNSON and No. 2:26-cv-00865-JAM VICTORIA LYNN JOHNSON, 12 individually and as Successors-in-Interest of GUY 13 ADAM JOHNSON, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Guy Patrick 20 and Victoria Lynn Johnson’s motion to remand the case to 21 Stanislaus County Superior Court. ECF No. 8 (“Mot.”). Defendant 22 County of Stanislaus filed an opposition (ECF No. 18 (“Opp’n”)), 23…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore-Thomas v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Travis v. IrbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. David R. Green v. Amerada Hess Corporation and L.A. StricklinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API