Legal Opinion

McGlasker v. Calton

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided July 17, 1975No. Civ. A. 75-161-NPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VARNER, District Judge.

This cause is submitted on Defendant Calton’s motion for summary judgment and the affidavits of various persons made in support and in opposition to said motion for summary judgment.

This cause, as finally amended, claims damages, costs and general relief against the Defendant, Fate Calton, individually and in his capacity as Judge of the Eastern District Court of Barbour County, Alabama, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Defendant Calton’s affidavits contain general conclusory statements by various people that all of the acts complained of which Judge Calton…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Horton E. Ryan, Individually and as Next Friend of Shana Ryan v. W. T. ScogginCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Almon v. BattlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. EVANS MICKENS v. CIRCUIT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUITDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2025
  3. McGlasker v. CaltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API