Johnson v. American Pile Driving Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEEKS, Senior District Judge.
Johnson brings this action, seeking to recover as a member of the crew of the defendant’s barge SNOHOMISH, for personal injuries suffered in a fall aboard that vessel. The resolution of Johnson’s status necessitates exploration of the marginal reach of protection afforded to members of the crew of a vessel under the Jones Act and the general maritime law.
The salient facts of the case may be summarized as follows: Defendant, American Pile Driving Co., Inc. (“American”) is a marine construction company of which Johnson was an employee. During the spring of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- GRIMES v. RAYMOND CONCRETE PILE CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Robert M. Burns v. Anchor-Wate Co. And Brown and Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Tommy Gene Keener v. Transworld Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Douglas A. Bullis v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- William E. Bennett v. Perini CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.