Legal Opinion

Schivarelli v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 20, 2005No. 1-02-1735PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

In March 1983, plaintiffs, Mary and Peter Schivarelli, entered into a lease agreement with defendant, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), to lease the unused space under the Fullerton El stop in Chicago. Under the agreement, plaintiffs agreed to construct and operate a hot dog stand, Demon Dogs, at the site. In 1997, the CTA discovered that it had mistakenly been paying the utility expenses for Demon Dogs with its own utility bills for the Fullerton station. The CTA sent plaintiffs a notice of default for the accrued utility costs, and in response, plaintiffs filed a complaint for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. May v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lindahl v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. South Suburban Safeway Lines, Inc. v. Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Suburban Bank of Hoffman-Schaumburg v. BousisIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dynegy Marketing and Trade v. Multiut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Gambino v. Boulevard Mortgage Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Williams v. Office of the Chief Judge of Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Thomson Learning, Inc. v. Olympia Properties, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API