Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Ro-Jack's Food Stores, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 20, 2001Published

1Opinion of the CourtWinslow, J.

The defendant supermarket (“Ro-Jack’s”) appeals from a judgment in favor of a plaintiff customer (“Anderson”) who suffered personal injuries when she slipped on a piece of lettuce while shopping. The trial judge, hearing the matter without a jury on remand from the Superior Court found for Anderson based on Ro-Jack’s failure to warn. In the absence of clear error, we affirm the judgment

The trial judge found that Anderson, while pushing a shopping cart slipped on a piece of lettuce and fell on her back. Because of the cart Anderson could not see the lettuce. The spot where Anderson fell is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oliveri v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Deagle v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Capitol Bank & Trust Co. v. RichmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Thurlow v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Robinson v. Ipswich Post 1093, V.F.W. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API