Legal Opinion

Fairchild v. Harbison

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1919No. 20626Published

Appeal from the chancery court of Washington county. ... HoN. E. N. Thomas, Chancellor. Bill by Sarah W. Harbison against Chas. H. Fair-child and others, in which Joe Banks, and others intervene. From the judgment rendered, defendants appeal. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the chancery court of Washington county. ... HoN. E. N. Thomas, Chancellor. Bill by Sarah W. Harbison against Chas. H. Fair-child and others, in which Joe Banks, and others intervene. From the judgment rendered, defendants appeal. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. We respectfully submit that the court by reason of a misunderstanding or confusion of the issues involved was in error in affirming the Banks case, in so far as Susan Banks, the sister of Chas. IT. Fairchild, Sr., having acquired an undivided one-half interest in the land in controversy, and submit…

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

The appellee Sarah W. Harbinson filed a hill in chancery court to foreclose a mortgage upon certain lands, which mortgage was-given by. Chas. H. Fairchild. The prayer for relief was that a lien he fixed against 'the property, a commissioner .appointed to make sale to pay the indebtedness and attorney’s fees, and for the conveyance of such sale, • and for general relief. Ap-pellees Joe Banks, Yirse Banks,. Eugene Banks, Sam Banks, and Tom Banks, by their next friend, Susan Banks, and the wife and children of ,Chas. Fairchild, intervene as parties defendant, setting up that ' they were the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cassady v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API