Legal Opinion

Cloninger v. Summit

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 1856PublishedCited by 18 opinions

This case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPearsoit, J.

The plaintiff has proved all the material allegations of his hill, notwithstanding the denial in the answer. According to the pleadings and the proofs, the facts are, that in 1848, the plaintiff contracted with one Gevrpenter for the purchase of a small tract of land at the price of $110, to he paid in five annual instalments of $22 each, for which he executed to Carpenter his notes, and took from Carpenter a bond for title, when the purchase-money was paid; thereupon, the plaintiff went into possession, and has lived on the land ever since. Before the last notes fell due, Carpenter, having…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Sykes v. Boone.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Avery v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Brogden v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. McNinch v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API