Legal Opinion

State v. Steen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On motion for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The borough of Eatontown was duly incorporated in accordance with the provisions of an act entitled “An act for the formation of borough governments,” approved April 5th, 1878. Pamph. L., p. 403.

In 1881, the legislature passed an act supplementary to the act of 1878, providing “that the legal voters of any borough incorporated under the act to which this is a supplement, when the number of legal voters within the boundaries of said corporation does not exceed one. hundred and fifty, may, at *543any election hereafter being had, decide, by a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Botkin v. Mayor & Borough Council of WestwoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API