Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Puderer v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 17, 2016No. 15-KH-1359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Denied. Relator fails to show he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Relator’s remaining claims are repetitive and/or unsupported. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4. We attach hereto and make a part hereof the District Court’s oral reasons denying relator’s application.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Louisiana v. Darryl PudererLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. State of Louisiana v. Darryl PudererLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. State v. GrossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. State v. GrossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API