Legal Opinion

Fairbanks Morse & Co. v. District Court

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 14, 1933No. 40924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonegan, J.

— In the original action one Bradley, as plaintiff, brought suit in the district court of Palo Alto county against Fairbanks Morse & Company, Municipal Utilities Company and Emmetsburg Municipal Electric Light & Power Company, as co-defendants, claiming damages which he alleged he had sustained by reason of the breach of a contract of employment. The defendants answered separately. Later, the plaintiff filed a petition for the production of books and papers, to which the defendants filed a resistance. Upon hearing the trial court entered a rule directing the production of books and papers as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Iowa Loan & Trust Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. J. E. Tusant & Son Co. v. Chas. Weitz SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. Webster County District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. National Clay Products Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Darling Stores Corporation v. Young Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  3. Galdi v. Caribbean Sugar Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Chandler v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API