Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of Elocin, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1983No. 60, 68, 69 E.D. Appeal Docket 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

501 Pa. 348 (1983)

461 A.2d 771

In re Appeal of ELOCIN, INC., From the Denial of its Challenges to the Validity of the Zoning Ordinance and Map of Springfield Township, Delaware County, and of Its Curative Amendment Application by the Board of Commissioners of Springfield Township, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 25, 1983.

Decided April 27, 1983.

Lloyd R. Ziff, Philadelphia, for Margaret Ziff, et al.

Harry J. Bradley, Media, Jan Z. Krasnowiecki, Philadelphia, for Springfield Tp.

James D. Crawford, Richard D. Birns, Philadelphia, for Elocin, et al.

Before ROBERTS, C.J., and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Nix; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hutchinson.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API