Scott v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentLukowsky, Justice
In my view Charlie Scott’s absence at the commencement and other critical stages of his trial for a felony not only violates RCr 8.28 and his rights protected by the constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth, it also offends traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Though it is far from established, I will assume that a defendant in custody can waive his right to be present at such a trial by refusing to attend. However, that waiver must be made by the defendant personally at a hearing in open court and found by the court to have been made voluntarily,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.