Legal Opinion

Bonner v. Coburn

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The decision of the chancellor was correct. The lots sued for belonged to the firm of Preston & Bonner. They were purchased with partnership funds, and the most valuable ones of them were used in carrying on the partnersMp business. The partnership having been dissolved by the death of H. L. Bonner, W. D. Preston, the surviving partner, by deed conveyed the lots to Maud P. Coburn for $5,000, to be used in paying the partnership debts. Upon the dissolution of the partnership by the death of Bonner, Preston, as the surviving partner, was charged with the duty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shanks v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Coolidge v. BurkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  3. Hanson v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. French v. VanattaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  5. Welch v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. McClainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  2. Fowler v. FranklinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Sutton v. McClainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API