Legal Opinion

De Luca v. Stein

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 2018No. COA17-1374PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

*119Plaintiffs' appeal asserts the trial court erred in concluding, as a matter of law, that payments specified in an agreement between the Attorney General of North Carolina and Smithfield Foods, Inc., and its subsidiaries are not civil penalties required to be used to fund public education pursuant to Article IX, § 7 of the North Carolina Constitution. The trial court's order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment and denying the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment is reversed in part and remanded for trial.

I. Background

On 25 July 2000, Michael F. Easley, in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Summey v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. Ridgeway Brands Manufacturing, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. De Luca v. SteinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. SteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  3. New Hanover County Board of Education v. SteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  4. New Hanover County Board of Education v. SteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  5. New Hanover Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. SteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API