Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dugan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1984No. 00193PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

The instant appeal arises from the judgment of sentence which was imposed after revocation of probation. Appellant makes three arguments on appeal: (1) that she was denied her right to a speedy probation violation hearing; (2) that the sentencing judge failed to state on the record adequate reasons for the sentence imposed; and (3) that the sentence imposed was excessive.

On January 12, 1978, appellant, Kay H. Dugan, pleaded guilty to nine counts of theft by deception, 1 nine counts of failure to make required disposition of funds received, 2 one count of forgery, 3 two counts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. BerriganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. MickellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. DanksCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API