Legal Opinion

Huffine v. Riadon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

Although the parties have described this action as one to reform a written instrument, it is, in essence, one by a junior mortgagee to have the lien of a senior mortgage subordinated, in part, to the lien of the junior mortgage, upon grounds that the senior mortgagee by fraudulent representations, induced the plaintiff junior mortgagee to release a prior lien on the property and take a junior lien.

The plaintiffs, Mr. & Mrs. Glenn H. Huf-fine, sold a house and lot to the defendants, William and Juanita Hicks. The purchasers paid $5,000.00 cash, assumed a mortgage loan of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Luther v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. McBurney v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Spotswood v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. First National Bank v. WentwortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lusk v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Battery Alliance, Inc. v. T & L Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  3. Jimmie Lipford v. First Family Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  4. Textron Financial Corp. v. Elaine E.PowellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API