Whedon v. Whedon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The written agreement of April 14, 1930, placed ownership of all the bonds in the defendant.
The title to the income from the bonds presents a different question. Defendant not only claimed at the trial, and claims here, that the agreement of April, 1930, is in all respects valid, but he *464himself testified on the trial that the income from the bonds even prior to April, 1930, belonged to his wife. It must follow that the income from April 14, 1930, up to the date of the wife’s death was also the property of the wife unless her title was affected by the agreements later made. This brings us to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- LaMontagne v. LaMontagneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Lamontagne v. LamontagneNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re the Estate of WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Markowitz v. MarkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Estate of DailNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- In re the Estate of De FrancescoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- In re the Estate of WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.