Legal Opinion
Wennihan v. AHCCCS
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 5, 2005No. CV-04-1642 PHX ROSPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SILVER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendants Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System’s (“AHCCCS”) and State of Arizona, Risk Management’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (“Motion”). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
On March 23, 2004, Plaintiff Kim A. Wennihan filed a complaint in Maricopa County Superior Court alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against AHCCCS. [Doc. # 1 (Notice of Removal), Ex. 1 ¶ III.] Later, on June 18, 2004, Plaintiff filed her First Amended…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilson v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMANDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Marcie a Redgrave v. Doug DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Adam Emmanuel Garcia v. City of Newport BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Karl Bohee v. Clinton HarrellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Marcos Munoz v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.