United States v. Dyncorp Int'l LLC
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DynCorp subsequently filed its answer, (ECF No. 27), which included twelve affirmative defenses. In response, the government took the unusual step of moving to strike four of these defenses, arguing that they "are legally invalid or improperly pled." (Mot. Strike at 1, ECF No. 31.) Two of the four defenses-the fifth and the sixth-relate to an audit conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA") and DynCorp's settlement with DOS. DynCorp argues that if the government found the contract prices reasonable, it cannot now be allowed to revisit that determination. (See Answer at 29-31.)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Weathers, Marc K.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Food Recovery Network, Inc. v. Means Database, Inc. D/B/A foodrecovery.orgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Schmuckley v. Rite Aid CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- United States v. AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023